Sig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP vs Sig Sauer Whiskey4 3-12x44 Hellfire Quadplex
Sig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP is a 1-6×24 SFP on a 30 mm tube with MOA turrets; Sig Sauer Whiskey4 3-12x44 Hellfire Quadplex is a 3-12×44 SFP on a 30 mm tube with MOA turrets. The Sig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP is lighter by 6.2 oz. The Sig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP has more elevation travel, 100 MOA to 80 MOA in the same unit. At its top magnification the Sig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP keeps a 4 mm exit pupil against 3.7 mm for the Sig Sauer Whiskey4 3-12x44 Hellfire Quadplex — estimated from the layout, not measured. On our last catalog check the Sig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP listed for about $50 less.
| Spec | Sig SauerSig Sauer Tango-MSR 1-6x24 SFP | Sig SauerSig Sauer Whiskey4 3-12x44 Hellfire Quadplex |
|---|---|---|
| Approx. price | ~$280 | ~$330 |
| Magnification | 1-6× | 3-12× |
| Objective lens | 24 mm | 44 mm |
| Focal plane | SFP | SFP |
| Reticle | MSR BDC6 | Hellfire Quadplex |
| Illuminated | Yes | Yes |
| Turret unit | MOA | MOA |
| Per click | 0.5 MOA (0.52″ at 100 yd) | 0.25 MOA (0.26″ at 100 yd) |
| Elevation travel | 100 MOA (≈29.1 MRAD) | 80 MOA (≈23.3 MRAD) |
| Windage travel | 100 MOA | 80 MOA |
| Zero stop | No | No |
| Turrets | Capped | Capped |
| Parallax | Fixed (distance not published) | Side focus |
| Eye relief | 3.74–3.93″ | 3.7–4″ |
| Field of view | 124.8–19.6 ft at 100 yd | 34.9–8.7 ft at 100 yd |
| Tube | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Length | 10.4″ | 12.2″ |
| Weight | 18.5 oz | 24.7 oz |
| Warranty | Infinite Guarantee | Infinite Guarantee |
| Exit pupilest. | 24–4 mm (1×–6×) | 14.7–3.7 mm (3×–12×) |
| Twilight factorest. | 12 at 6× | 23 at 12× |
| Zoom ratioest. | 6× | 4× |
| Where to buy | — | — |
Tinted rows are where these two differ. Rows marked est. are computed, not published.
Exit pupil and twilight factor are computed from the published magnification and objective diameter, not measured. Real exit pupil is also capped by the erector at low magnification, and coatings and glass quality move low-light performance in ways the formula cannot see — read these as comparisons between layouts, not verdicts on scopes.